(1)
Growing up in Toronto; a
vibrant city known for its multiculturism where we are surrounded by
small distinct cultural hub communities that present a vast variety
of delicious, mouth-watering, “authentic ethnic dishes” for us to
experience, indulge, and unleash our inner-foodie. Being born into
the Indian culture, I was exposed to traditional Indian cuisine from
a very young age. I can smell the spice, onions, aromas and all the
flavors from a mile away!
Living in the world with
mass globalization and commercialization of food; people often argue
about authenticity in food,
especially if they have travelled or tried home-cooked versions of
ethnic dishes. We are fortunate to live in a multi-cultural city with
many diverse dining options, but there is still an ongoing quest to
find “the most authentic food”.
But what does “authentic” really mean? Can it be defined? Does it
really matter, if it’s not authentic cuisine, but it taste
delicious?
Everyone has their own
interpretation and experience to eating “authentic ethnic dishes”.
The definitions of what “authentic ethnic dishes” is built
through our past experiences, our social environment, and mainstream
media.
Some people often hold
what they grew up with as a golden standard for authentic cuisine for
example, Jack Astor’s version of “Butter
Chicken”, in my opinion is not authentic
Indian cuisine, it is merely a production for uniqueness added to the
menu. The other gold standard for authenticity is what people bring
back after travelling to the place where the dish originated. We
have all met individuals like this in our lifetime; just because one
has tried sushi in Japan, croissants in Paris, chicken tikka masala
in India, does not necessarily make him or her a connoisseur of that
food.
Authentic
dishes ingredients, techniques, methods, recipes and traditions
evolve with time, place, chefs and plates. Quite often, recipes are
regional, or even unique to cities. It is also unreasonable to bring
these standards of authenticity to an ethnic table outside of its
origin.
When
considering foods outside of their natural context—that is, foods
eaten in a country or region that of where they do not originate—the
question of authenticity and what it means to be "authentic"
is always a vexing one. Ethnic food that
is made outside of its natural context can be deemed as inauthentic
by default. Think about it, ingredients and resources are limited and
vary from place to place, so just like the “eat local” movement
which is “as local as possible”, so is the goal for
“authenticity”. Ethnic food is often “as authentic as possible”
given the available ingredients. Global ingredients can be hard to
source and local ingredients just taste different so to replicate
flavours of a different country is nearly impossible.
The
ultimate question is, what does it mean to eat authentic cuisine and
more precisely, is it even possible for authenticity to be preserved
across the many barriers of language mapping, social custom, and
regional tastes? What's the verdict? Food doesn't have to be
"authentic" to be delicious—though it certainly helps to
maintain the spirit of the cuisine, culture, and history. The concept
of “authentic cuisine” has unquestionably pushed food forward in
this nation, exposing millions of new flavors, ingredients and spices
that no one imagined or experienced.



